paneherd

Compare

Paneherd vs VS Code Agent Sessions

By Eren Çolak, who makes Paneherd · Updated 24 October 2026

VS Code has its own sessions for agents: the Chat view works in your current workspace, and an Agents window manages several sessions across projects. Copilot is the default harness; Claude and Codex are offered as other harnesses.

Short answer: VS Code's own agent sessions are the natural choice if you use GitHub Copilot and want cloud agents and sessions across projects. Paneherd is for running the agent CLIs you already pay for as terminals in a grid, with status, one inbox for permission prompts and a phone remote.

VS Code Agent SessionsPaneherd
What runsAgents through VS Code's harnesses: Copilot, Copilot CLI, cloud agents, Claude and CodexThe agent CLIs you have installed: Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Gemini
Models and billingYour GitHub Copilot plan, your own API key or a local model, depending on the harnessEach CLI bills its own plan; Paneherd does not proxy models
Cloud agentsYes: run tasks away from your machine and return pull requestsNo; everything runs locally
Sessions across projectsAgents windowPer VS Code window
Worktree isolationAgents can save edits to a worktreeWorks with worktrees you create; warns on same-file edits (Pro)
Permission promptsApprovals set per sessionOne inbox across Claude Code sessions (Pro)
PhoneNot described in the docsPhone remote
PricePart of VS Code; agents need a Copilot plan or your own keyFree to 4 panes; Pro is a one-time purchase

Facts about VS Code are from its own documentation or README as of 24 October 2026. Tools change quickly; tell us on GitHub if something is out of date. We make Paneherd.

Where VS Code Agent Sessions is the better choice

Where Paneherd is the better choice

Paneherd is not for you if

Can you use both?

Often yes. Paneherd runs the CLIs you already have, so it can sit next to VS Code Agent Sessions rather than replace it. See also the full comparison.

Install Paneherd free